Has anyone heard of Max Wertheimer ? B.F. Skinner ?

or maybe even more recently Abraham Maslow? These

are the literal 'fathers' of traditional psychology that has

no room for the paranormal or strange phenomenal.

Why?

It cannot be measured under the parameters these mind

scientists used. Experimental design lacks imagination

and allows for a skeptic to be proven more accurate, so

experiential design is discounted and relied on even less.

I figure if we bring more personal testimony, documentation

from people like Allison Dubois, John Edwards, & Edgar Cayce,

these kind of 'seers' the skeptic is ultimately challenged.

Why so ?

By using the Gestalt method, the American behaviorism,

or more recently the Humanistic approach exclusively w/o

inclusion of the transpersonal approach, what are we really

gaining? Are we not missing the point a skeptic and a believer

are both making and find the cohesive ingredient between the

two of them ?

Click into image to see Review . . .

I am curious to know... originally composed 4-15-2005